- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 22:48:24 +0000
- To: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
± From: Daniel Holbert [mailto:dholbert@mozilla.com] ± Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2012 3:46 PM ± ± On 06/12/2012 03:09 PM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote: ± > ± To be clearer / more specific: do we want "min-height:auto" to ever ± > compute to ± something nonzero on a flex item in a horizontal flexbox? ± > ± ± > Min/max 'auto' should have no meaning on cross axis (therefore zero, as you ± suggest). ± ± Cool - I think I agree with you on that. ± ± > I believe the spec currently defines exactly that. ± ± Nope, it doesn't -- that's why I started this thread. ± ± As noted in my initial post, the spec currently just says that min-width/min- ± height:auto gets special treatment "on a flex item". There is no indication ± that this special behavior is main-axis-specific. Let's fix it.
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 22:49:17 UTC