- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 14:17:51 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > fantasai wrote (quoting me): >> >> > ...it seems :hover should be defined, at least for HTML's purposes, as >> > working as follows: >> > >> > : An element matches :hover if: >> > : >> > : - It is designated by a pointing device, or >> > : - Any of its descendants are designated by a pointing device, or >> > : - It is the "labeled control" of a<label> element that matches :hover. >> > >> > Like Boris, I don't mind where this is specced, but we should spec it >> > somewhere. Is the Selectors spec able to spec this? >> Technically, yes, but I think it's a bit out of scope for Selectors to >> specify HTML-element-specific behavior. Is it very specific to :hover? > > > It's very specific to :hover, yes; there is also a click-related issue but > that's already specced. I can spec the :hover bit it in HTML if you think > that would be more appropriate; I don't mind either way. Should I? Yes, that would be great. Do you need an anchor in Selectors to link to? ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 21:18:40 UTC