- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:04:58 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Chris Lilley: > On Tuesday, January 31, 2012, 12:19:06 PM, Simon wrote: > >> SVG 1.1 is a W3C Recommendation, but the property is not in any CSS spec (AFAIK) so I prefixed it. However, this case is not covered in http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/vendor-prefixes I’ve added a section to the Wiki page and marked its recommendations as “disputed”. >> As an implementer, should I use a prefix in such a case? >> > No, the property is in a W3C Recommendation so it does not need a prefix. Oh, I remembered the list consensus otherwise. Feel free to update the Wiki and finally get a WG resolution out of that, publicly available at w3.org. Is it guaranteed that two WGs will never develop incompatible features with the same name? (I would assert it already happened.)
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 17:05:25 UTC