W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

RE: [css3-flexbox] does flex-order impact stacking order of overlapping content

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:03:30 +0000
To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D51C9E849DDD0D4EA38C2E539856928412E20836@TK5EX14MBXC218.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Can't find the thread, I think it was a couple of years ago.

Anyway, apparently we use document order for drawing even if reordered in flexbox, so it agrees with what you are saying.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex Mogilevsky [mailto:alexmog@microsoft.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:22 PM
>To: Daniel Holbert; www-style@w3.org list
>Subject: RE: [css3-flexbox] does flex-order impact stacking order of
>overlapping content
>
>>From: Daniel Holbert [mailto:dholbert@mozilla.com]
>>Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 12:04 PM
>>To: www-style@w3.org list
>>Subject: [css3-flexbox] does flex-order impact stacking order of
>>overlapping content
>>
>>Hi www-style,
>>
>>In the current Flexbox ED "Layout Algorithm" section, it says this
>>about
>>flex-order:
>>
>> > Re-order the flexbox items according to their 'flex-order'.
>>[...]
>> > This affects the order in which the flexbox items generate  > boxes
>> > in
>>the box-tree
>>
>>Given that -- hypothetically, if two flexbox items were to contain
>>overlapping content[1], would flex-order have any effect on which one
>>overlaps the other? (i.e. does flex-order affect stacking in the z
>>axis?)
>
>We have discussed this before. Let me look it up.
>
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 21:04:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:49 GMT