W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

RE: [css3-flexbox] What types of box-tree fixup can occur?

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 01:36:57 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D51C9E849DDD0D4EA38C2E539856928412E1E055@TK5EX14MBXC218.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
± Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 3:14 PM
± For clarity, I have currently specified that table-fixup occurs
± *before* flexbox does its thing, but block-in-inline fixup occurs *after*.
± This appears to be consistent with how these two fixup steps occur in
± block layout, based on the limited testing I've done so far.
± What other kinds of box-tree fixup might occur?  We removed "display:run-
± in" from 2.1, so I don't need to worry about that (yet), but I will
± someday.  What about Ruby?  Anything else?

Ruby should work like tables. I am really not sure about run-in.

I don't think either should be mentioned (normatively) though, or it would create dependency on other drafts. IMO table is good enough for guidance.

Actually why not move the note on table fixup to definition of flex item? That's where it is important.

BTW I hope you don't imply that 'flex-order' can affect how anonymous items are wrapped.
Received on Friday, 27 January 2012 01:37:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:54 UTC