- From: Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:49:12 +0900
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
During the last F2F at TPAC CSSWG resolved to "evaluate CSS2.1 and republish if necessary to keep it up-to-date." So it can get updates. <http://www.w3.org/blog/CSS/2011/12/02/resolutions-10/> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > The overall changes I would like to see in the Tables chapter of CSS 2.1 are > much more significant than what is currently in the errata. However, Tables > level 3 is marked inactive. > > Now that 2.1 is a REC, can it still get updates? If not, are Level 3 modules > that supersede parts of it the only way to make changes? Or should we target > CSS 2.2? > > What we’re discussing on tables include normative changes, but no new > features. Maybe it is not worth a level 3 module? > > Regards, > -- > Simon Sapin > -- Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 11:49:59 UTC