W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

RE: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is duplicated or points to the wrong spec

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 06:15:11 +0000
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
CC: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9710FCC2E88860489239BE0308AC5D170EB1EF88@TK5EX14MBXC264.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
... and (in prefixed form) in <image> radial gradients in IE10 previews.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sylvain Galineau [mailto:sylvaing@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 23, 2012 9:42 PM
> To: L. David Baron; Aryeh Gregor
> Cc: Lea Verou; www-style list
> Subject: RE: [css3-2d-transforms][css3-images] <position> grammar is
> duplicated or points to the wrong spec
> 
> 
> [L. David Baron:]
> >
> > On Monday 2012-01-23 12:32 -0500, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > In any case, we are way offtopic. :) If you disagree with the
> > > > background-position syntax, please start a new thread about it
> > > > (tagged with [css3-background] or [css4-background])
> > >
> > > I don't think we should change background-position syntax, if
> that's
> > > what browsers implement already.  I do think we shouldn't copy it
> to
> > > transform-origin, given that browsers haven't implemented it yet.
> >
> > Gecko's started implementing the new background-position syntax; I
> don't
> > know if anybody else has.
> 
> Support for it shipped in IE9.

Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2012 06:15:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT