19.01.2012, 04:50, "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>: > [Marat Tanalin:] > >> š18.01.2012, 21:58, "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>: >>> š[Marat Tanalin:] >>>> šš18.01.2012, 21:16, "Sylvain Galineau" <sylvaing@microsoft.com>: >>>>> šš[Marat Tanalin:] >>>>>> ššš18.01.2012, 20:48, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>: >>>>>>> šššOn Wed, 18 Jan 2012, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote: >>>>>>>> ššššIn case of it was not clear enough yet: my goal is not to find >>>>>>>> ša >>>>>>>> ššššsolution for a specific task. Instead, my goal is to improve >>>>>>>> šCSS >>>>>> šššitself. >>>>>>> šššChanges that aren't solutions to specific tasks aren't >> šimprovements. >>>>>> šššConsider increased flexibility as a task if you want. >>>>> ššIt's not. What the increased flexibility is used for would be the >> štask. >>>> ššInsreased flexibity, oddly to say, allows to increase usability, >>>> ššproductivity, and maintainability. >>> šThen provide one or more real-world example demonstrating all this >>> šwill happen and explain why. General assertions are insufficient. >> šSee http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Jan/0760.html > > That is not a use-case. A use-case states a problem and explains how > the proposal leads to a better solution. > > That post simply says "If I have this feature I can X this way". It's > totally unclear why doing this way is superior or beneficial. Do you understand what is flexibility? It's ability to do same thing different ways.Received on Thursday, 19 January 2012 12:49:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT