W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

Re: [css3-writing-modes] A report from a meeting w/Japanese publishing group

From: Brady Duga <duga@ljug.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:41:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKpG1kEULbi1qpJuezOz_rV0_qATz9RodYMNRO9tZPEoUK7YFw@mail.gmail.com>
To: koba <koba@antenna.co.jp>
Cc: MURATA Makoto <eb2m-mrt@asahi-net.or.jp>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
If I can just restate the issues in a very simplified manner to see if I am
correct in my understanding of the problem:

1. In a vertical text flow, some glyphs may need to be rendered differently
then in a horizontal flow (rotated or replaced)
2. This cannot always be determined algorithmically
3. The writing modes module addresses this with styles to determine glyph
4. Currently, glyph selection is a function of the underlying font engine
(eg 'vert' gsub table in OpenType), not CSS (or Unicode)

Is item 4 the problem under discussion in the blog post? Is that the
original issue Koji raised? I apologize if these are obvious questions, I
am having a little difficulty following the discussion - the Google
Translate page of the blog post was surprisingly good, but I think some of
the important details were lost.


On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 3:16 AM, koba <koba@antenna.co.jp> wrote:

> Murata-san
> > In your blog, you argue against font-independent determination.
> > I am interested in further discussions about this topic.
> I am still making further review, and hope to make a post in Unicode
> TR#50 forum, if it will be helpful.
> Regards,
> Tokushige Kobayashi
> --
> koba <koba@antenna.co.jp>
> http://www.antenna.co.jp
> http://www.cas-ub.com
> http://blog.cas-ub.com
> twitter @TokKoba
Received on Saturday, 14 January 2012 16:07:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:54 UTC