W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

Re: [css3-syntax] CSS escape sequences

From: Mathias Bynens <mathias@qiwi.be>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 17:40:20 +0100
Message-ID: <CACrCd9Ov_eQyKXN8KPcus5ssqzo7e3Tsq-yVgE87_OZqzvG+bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> If significant numbers of authors are relying on the surrogate pair
> behavior, we should spec it.  If UAs report that it would be very
> difficult to fix their bug and they're not willing to do so, we should
> spec it.  Otherwise, we should keep the preferred behavior currently
> in the spec and file bugs on browsers to fix it.

Amen. Either way, the spec needs an update.

> CSS doesn't use a 'u' prefix on escapes, so the first part of this testcase
> is just wrong.

Apologies, I got mixed up with JavaScript again. Here’s a better test
case: http://jsfiddle.net/mathias/5eqGM/
WebKit browsers appear to drop the entire `content` declaration, while
other browsers display U+FFFD followed by either “?” (Trident) or “!”
(Gecko), or nothing (Presto).

> Opera 11.52 on Mac seems to use some sort of "half a surrogate" replacement
> characters or something.

Indeed, here’s a screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/CJuVE.png High
surrogates and low surrogates get a different replacement character.
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 16:41:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT