- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:36:07 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
On 29/11/2011 20:57, fantasai wrote: > On 11/22/2011 12:29 PM, fantasai wrote: >> Gérard Talbot recently pointed me at this section, which seems to have >> an error in it: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#height-layout >> # The height of a 'table-row' element's box is calculated once the >> user agent >> # has all the cells in the row available: it is the maximum of the >> row's computed >> # 'height', the computed 'height' of each cell in the row, and the >> minimum height >> # (MIN) required by the cells. A 'height' value of 'auto' for a >> 'table-row' means >> # the row height used for layout is MIN. MIN depends on cell box >> heights and cell >> # box alignment (much like the calculation of a line box height). >> >> Read literally, it says that 'height' on table cells is ignored unless >> 'height' on >> the table row is non-auto. That seems wrong. > > There's another issue on this sentence, which is whether 'height' on the > table cell > is added to its border+padding and then applied as a minimum on the row, > or whether > it is directly applied to the row box. It appears we do not have interop > on this. fantasai, this is being tracked at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15462 Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Monday, 9 January 2012 09:39:04 UTC