On Jan 6, 2012, at 2:01 PM, Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney@gmail.com> wrote: > Although as currently written the spec seems to imply that if neither > width nor height are underspecified, then aspect-ratio is ignored, > correct? Tab's draft says so with this: If aspect-ratio is not none, but neither width nor height are underspecified for the element, aspect-ratio must have no effect. I'm not sure I agree this is the best thing. I think it would be better for fallback if we can author both width and height and have the height overridden by the aspect ratio.
Received on Saturday, 7 January 2012 11:23:35 UTC