W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2012

Re: `overflow: hidden` on tables for border rounding doesn't seem to be supported by the standard

From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 11:50:27 -0800
Message-ID: <bfd6606f0f72898feff272c670fcd88c.squirrel@gtalbot.org>
To: "Anton Prowse" <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Cc: "www-style mailing list" <www-style@w3.org>

Le Lun 2 janvier 2012 3:08, Anton Prowse a écrit :
> On 03/12/2011 18:35, "Gérard Talbot" wrote:
>>
>> Le Sam 3 décembre 2011 3:36, Anton Prowse a écrit :
>>> On 02/12/2011 21:52, www-style@gtalbot.org wrote:
>>>> Øyvind Stenhaug<oyvinds@opera.com>  a écrit :
>>>>> On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 03:47:47 +0100, Gérard Talbot
>>>>> <www-style@gtalbot.org>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> overflow applies to inline-table elements though according to
>>>>>> http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-217
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I can't help think that it's kinda weird ... overflow applies to
>>>>>> inline-tables but not to fixed-width tables.<shrug>
>>>>>
>>>>> The text modified due to that issue was since superseded by
>>>>> <http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-120>  and
>>>>> <http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-266>. Per the current spec
>>>>> text, overflow does not apply to 'inline-table' nor 'table'.
>
> [...]
>
>>> In the Applies To line of the 'overflow' property, "non-replaced
>>> block-level elements, table cells, and inline-block elements" should
>>> have been changed to "block containers and table boxes" not to "block
>>> containers".
>
> [...]
>
>>> Gérard, would you mind summarizing what the browser support is for
>>> http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/overflow-applies-to-013.htm.
>>
>> I can do this for overflow-applies-to-013.htm and
>> overflow-applies-to-014.htm . Where do you want me to do this?
>
> Thanks very much, Gérard.  I've created a bug for this issue:
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15381.  If you would be
> willing to comment on that bug about browser support for your test, that
> would be great.  It's highly likely that the spec will be changed in
> errata to correspond to what it originally said.

Done.

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15381#c1

best wishes for 2012,

Gérard

-- 
CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011
http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html

Contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/

Web authors' contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Monday, 2 January 2012 19:50:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:48 GMT