W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [CSSWG] Agenda conf call 29-feb-2012

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:48:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4F4E56F8.3060105@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Le 29/02/12 17:46, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Daniel Glazman
> <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>  wrote:
>> Le 28/02/12 22:49, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
>>> If we do, we should broaden it to all non-W3C references, like RFCs,
>>> which we definitely refer to in some places.
>>
>> FIWI, RFCs are a bit different here: W3C does not have working groups
>> on same topics and specs of same names...
>
> Irrelevant; the concern is with patents, not politics.

Don't tell _me_ that. The CSS WG is still a W3C WG, and W3C does
have some rules.

</Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 29 February 2012 16:49:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:51 GMT