W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-transitions] shorthand/longhand handling in transition property

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 18:31:15 -0800
To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20120217023115.GA8637@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Friday 2012-02-17 01:55 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote:
> > So the current editor's draft contains the wording:
> > 
> >   # If a property is specified multiple times in the value of
> >   # ‘transition-property’ (either on its own, via a shorthand that
> >   # contains it, or via the ‘all’ value), then the transition that
> >   # starts uses the duration, delay, and timing function at the
> >   # index corresponding to the last item in the value of
> >   # ‘transition-property’ that calls for animation that property.
> > 
> > (It's been there for a bit, though I just modified it a bit to match a
> > resolution regarding 'all' that we made at TPAC.)
> > 
> > I think this makes things clear enough.  Does it seem ok to you?
> > 
> It does, yes. Though the last line looks odd. Did you mean
> 
> ...that calls for animation *of* that property
> 
> Or
> 
> ....that calls for animating *that* property

Indeed I did; that was part of what I'd just changed.  I used your
latter option to fix it.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-commits/2012Feb/0147.html

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 02:31:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT