On Friday 2012-02-17 01:55 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > So the current editor's draft contains the wording: > > > > # If a property is specified multiple times in the value of > > # ‘transition-property’ (either on its own, via a shorthand that > > # contains it, or via the ‘all’ value), then the transition that > > # starts uses the duration, delay, and timing function at the > > # index corresponding to the last item in the value of > > # ‘transition-property’ that calls for animation that property. > > > > (It's been there for a bit, though I just modified it a bit to match a > > resolution regarding 'all' that we made at TPAC.) > > > > I think this makes things clear enough. Does it seem ok to you? > > > It does, yes. Though the last line looks odd. Did you mean > > ...that calls for animation *of* that property > > Or > > ....that calls for animating *that* property Indeed I did; that was part of what I'd just changed. I used your latter option to fix it. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-css-commits/2012Feb/0147.html -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂Received on Friday, 17 February 2012 02:31:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT