W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-flexbox] ED updated: algorithms and 'flex' property

From: Tony Chang <tony@chromium.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:10:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL-=4P2W+VxJahLyc8zbFvw=h_-05gZ1U6=GCDdNShqx63W3oQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Why is the initial value of flex 'none'?  Why can't it be '0 0 auto' or
'auto'?

I find the use of 'auto' for preferred size meaning the value of width or
height confusing.  Can we name it something else?

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
> > I have updated the spec with yesterday’s feedback on algorithms and
> changed
> > “flex()” to ‘flex’ as we agreed at F2F.
> >
> > The only significant change left to do is finalize what auto margins do
> and
> > put it in the spec. Otherwise, the spec should be ready for review (while
> > editors add examples and clean up text).
> >
> > Tab – do the changes look OK? Agree on my assessment of spec status?
>
> I'll be reviewing them in depth today!
>
> ~TJ
>
>
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 20:10:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT