One clarification -- of course, in my example, the abspos div's y-position would be taken from its static position which is inside the flexbox (at its placeholder's position). But the part I'm wanting to sanity-check is that the x-position (from "left: 10px") is with respect to the outer div, not to the flexbox. Thanks, ~Daniel On 02/09/2012 10:05 AM, Daniel Holbert wrote: > Just wanted to be sure I'm understanding correctly: flexboxes do *not* > act as containing blocks for absolutely-positioned children, correct? > Instead, the flexbox's closest ancestor that is a block will serve that > purpose. (?) > > e.,g. if I have > <div id="outer"> > <div style="display:flexbox"> > <div style="position:absolute; left: 10px">test</div> > </div> > <div> > > ...then my understanding is that the absolutely positioned element is > positioned with respect to div#outer -- *not* with respect to the > flexbox -- since div#outer is the containing block. Is that right? > > Thanks! > ~Daniel >Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 19:01:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT