- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 14:02:06 +0100
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 20:30:35 +0000, Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com> wrote: > On Friday, August 27, 2010 9:30 AM Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 8/27/10 9:02 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote: >>> Well, if they increment the padding then they only do so for auto >>> height, not when the height of the outer div is explicitly set to 100px. >> >> Ah, ok. That's interesting.... For an auto-height div, putting the scrollbar into >> the padding is clearly the right behavior from the standpoint of authors. >> Otherwise any overflow:auto block with horizontal overflow and auto height >> would also be forced to have vertical overflow, right? So I think we should >> make sure that the spec handles that case well. > Thank you for your feedback. The CSSWG resolved not to make changes > to the CSS 2.1 specification[1]. We will be reevaluating this issue > for errata and future versions of CSS. Øyvind and Boris, this issue is filed at https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15880 Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2012 13:02:34 UTC