W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2012

Re: [css3-exclusions] issue with shape-outside: url() (ISSUE-296)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 14:56:17 +0100
Message-ID: <50C5EA01.8060202@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/12/12 02:18, Rossen Atanassov wrote:

> The idea of being able to re-position a shape was considered before and what we agreed at the time was to introduce a shape-transform. What is this needed and/or different than css transforms - simply because it has to affect layout (as the shape moves there must be a reflow around it etc.).
>
> We also agreed that this is not something we want to take for the current version of the spec, thus I'm not sure why these changes are needed now.

Why ? This is simple, Rossen ; see this:

   #foo {
     float: right;
     width: 400px;
     height: 350px;
     shape-outside: url(foo.png) /* a 100x150px image */
   }

Where is placed the exclusion in #foo's box ? Centered ? Cornered?

</Daniel>
Received on Monday, 10 December 2012 13:56:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:03 GMT