W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2012

[CSSWG] Minutes Telecon 2012-12-07

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:24:03 -0800
Message-ID: <50C26C83.7070009@inkedblade.net>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Summary:

   - discussed February F2F logistics
   - objection to publishing CSS3 Text LC before next F2F
   - RESOLVED: Publish CSS3 Fonts WD
   - RESOLVED: No exceptional zeroing of negative margins for flex items.
   - RESOLVED: Min/max clamping step of resolving flexible lengths does
               not pass cross-size limits through aspect ratio into main
               size flex computations.
   - Various Flexbox clarifications reviewed:
       http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/diff/2dfe9b0d813f/css3-flexbox/Overview.src.html
       http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/diff/c963d3ec23b8/css3-flexbox/Overview.src.html
       http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/diff/9d29cc6d8a95/css3-flexbox/Overview.src.html
   - Issue on handling aspect ratio during main size computations still
     being worked out:
       http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Oct/0781.html
       http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/diff/284a967553ae/css3-flexbox/Overview.src.html
   - Discussed case-sensitivity of CSS identifiers. i18n recommends
     case-folding. Anne recommends ascii-folding.
     Points brought up:
       - Some implementations seem to do some form of Unicode case-insensitivity
         for class name matching. Some do ASCII-only.
       - HTML spec requires ASCII-folding only for its case-insensitivity
       - ASCII-folding is easier to implement correctly
       - ASCII-folding is really weird for non-English languages with case
         Previous uses of case-insensitivity were ASCII-only idents,
         where this wasn't a usability issue.
     No conclusions yet.

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 7 December 2012 22:24:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:03 GMT