W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Explicit feature manifesting for backward-compatibility safety (Was: Comment syntax)

From: Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 03:07:14 +0400
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro <zmyaro@gmail.com>, Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>, Jens O. Meiert <jens@meiert.com>
Message-Id: <1701371346108834@web23f.yandex.ru>
28.08.2012, 02:27, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>:
> Right now, you can naively minify just by replacing all runs of
> whitespace with a single space.  (The only exception is if you use a \
> at the end of a line to create a multi-line string, but this is rare
> enough that I wouldn't be surprised if there were plenty of naive
> minifiers that didn't take this into account.)  If you use // comments
> on your source document, the minified document today will act
> identically (the next property will be ignored as invalid).  If we
> switched behavior, it would instead remove the entire rest of the
> stylesheet.
> This is, unfortunately, a problem with *existing* stylesheets, so we
> can't just rely on the "well, don't do that" defense.  I'd like a
> reasonable assurance that adding this wouldn't cause a significant
> number of sites to suddenly break due to this. ^_^

A way to explicitly manifest newer features that author of specific styleshet is intended to use in the stylesheet would be helpful in cases like introducing new syntax features like one-line comments [1]:

    @features {

In the example, new features that are potentially risky for older user agents and/or stylesheets are _disabled by default_. Such features then are enabled _only_ if they are listed in `@features` rule that means "this stylesheet's author knows about this feature and intends to use it".

So, for newer CSS stylesheets, we could add this:

    @features {

to top of CSS file to be able to use one-line comments in rest part of CSS file. Existing stylesheets does _not_ contain such declaration, so they are _not_ affected at all, and therefore there is _no_ any backward-compatibility issues.

Each of feature keywords like `one-line-comments` to use in `@features` rule would be listed and described in CSS spec.

`@features` is somewhat like `@supports` [2], but is not limited to properties and values and does not require to wrap all related code.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Aug/0622.html
[2] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-conditional/#at-supports
Received on Monday, 27 August 2012 23:07:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:03 UTC