W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [css4-images] First draft of css4-images, feedback requested

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 08:52:42 -0700
Message-Id: <1DFBF13F-5AAF-43E7-A225-4BA911DEF3D2@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, "Aharon (Vladimir) Lanin" <aharon@google.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, Kang-Hao Lu <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Aug 8, 2012, at 7:33 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:44 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Aug 7, 2012, at 12:42 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>>> I think ¡°background¡± has been (ab)used enough.
>>>> 
>>>> If the feature is important, make it part of image() not background.
>>> 
>>> Definitely agree, though if I explored this in more detail, I'd do it
>>> with an @image at-rule that was basically creating a simplified form
>>> of SVG filters/etc in CSS.
>> 
>> That sounds like it'd be harder to animate.
> 
> Not necessarily.  You'd "just" define the way in which animating an
> <image-graph> or whatever works, which would involve animating the
> sub-properties.  I highly doubt you'd ever want to animate just some
> of the parts of it, after all.
> 
> ~TJ

Can you elaborate with what that would look like?
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 15:53:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:58 GMT