Re: [css3-box] run-ins: an alternative model

On 8/7/12 9:44 PM, fantasai wrote:
> I think it's less weird for the out-of-flows to stay between the element's
> they're between. It also seems easier from an implementation perspective,
> since you can preserve the painting order through the box-tree order as
> usual, no?

I hadn't thought about the painting order, to be honest.  I don't know 
what the "right" thing here is in terms of painting...

>      * If a run-in is preceded by an inline-level box that is not
>        a run-in (ignoring any anonymous inline boxes containing only
>        collapsed white space), then it forces the creation of an
>        anonymous block boundary between it and the preceding inline,
>        as if it were immediately preceded by an empty anonymous block.

Better, but see comments about "anonymous block boundary" really needing 
defining.

-Boris