W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [css3-box] run-ins: an alternative model

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:19:10 -0400
Message-ID: <5021CC9E.40602@mit.edu>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 8/7/12 9:44 PM, fantasai wrote:
> I think it's less weird for the out-of-flows to stay between the element's
> they're between. It also seems easier from an implementation perspective,
> since you can preserve the painting order through the box-tree order as
> usual, no?

I hadn't thought about the painting order, to be honest.  I don't know 
what the "right" thing here is in terms of painting...

>      * If a run-in is preceded by an inline-level box that is not
>        a run-in (ignoring any anonymous inline boxes containing only
>        collapsed white space), then it forces the creation of an
>        anonymous block boundary between it and the preceding inline,
>        as if it were immediately preceded by an empty anonymous block.

Better, but see comments about "anonymous block boundary" really needing 
defining.

-Boris
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 02:19:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:58 GMT