W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: [css3-box] run-ins: an alternative model

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 21:08:13 -0400
Message-ID: <5021BBFD.2040800@mit.edu>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On 8/7/12 8:42 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On 8/7/12 8:20 PM, fantasai wrote:
>>>       * If a run-in is preceded by an inline box (ignoring any anonymous
>>>         inline boxes containing only collapsed white space),
>>>         then it forces the creation of an anonymous block boundary
>>>         between it and the preceding inline.
>>
>>
>> I'm not sure this works, for two reasons:
>>
>> 1)  In a sequence of run-ins, a previous one would trigger this for a later
>> one, right?
>
> No.  Run-ins *lay out* like inlines, but they're not inlines, and so
> don't trigger that clause.  (They're inline-level.)

Well, hold on.  Do we not want to trigger that clause for inline-tables 
and inline-blocks?  Why not?

-Boris
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2012 01:08:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:58 GMT