W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Pseudo-element proposal

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:30:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCaBzDKzyiBnQRtoyY687rqiBh4X=Givox=AoF+MH4N5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is masquerading in the native space as if it were native, so if
> it ever were implemented there might well be API differences.  Why
> shouldn't there be a single simple logic that applies in all cases?
>
> Again, maybe I am alone in that, but it seems weird that proof of
> concept requires no prefix, but then browsers do and then later it
> doesn't.  Those seem like three different potential phases that
> shouldn't interfere - as long as they don't use a -moz- prefix or
> something there is no danger that they could interfere (or conflict)
> with a browser implementation, but native they could.

Oh, sorry, I completely missed that you were talking about the JS
shim, not the actual spec.  Carry on.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 19:30:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:58 GMT