W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2012

Re: Pseudo-element proposal

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 21:06:50 +0200
Message-ID: <5021674A.5020100@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
Le 07/08/12 20:52, Brian Kardell a écrit :
> I love that this is available in JS, a few of us have been proposing
> that this is an excellent way to get things rolling, etc...
>
> However, even in another thread today we were discussing prefixing,
> forward compatibility, etc. and I feel like suggesting that this would
> be even better if it did not try to literally polyfill something in
> the native space which may or may not be implemented in the future
> with similar/partial APIs or differences.  Does anyone else think that
> it might be better to prefix the experimental pseudos?

Experimental pseudos are prefixed by all browser vendors. Adobe's
JS code is a more a proof of concept than code that should be used
in production environments, and that code is, to the best extent,
browser-agnostic. That's why the prototype has no prefixes for the
proposed new pseudos.

</Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 7 August 2012 19:07:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:58 GMT