- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:54:11 -0700
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> As written today, filters from ancestors are honored. It may be >> better to change this, and ignore filters from ancestors, just like we >> ignore transforms from ancestors. > > I think it's essential that all effects on ancestors (e.g. transforms, > clipping, opacity, filters, masking) be ignored. Having some effects and not > others be applied would be confusing and also very difficult to implement. Okay. Do we have a good definition of "effects", or is it just something we have to decide case-by-case? ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 1 August 2012 04:55:00 UTC