W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

Re: [selectors4] :not accepts a compound selector

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:59:55 -0700
Message-ID: <4E8649EB.2010408@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/30/2011 01:27 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>
> I just found the level 3 row confusing. As it is now, it makes it sound like you have to give multiple arguments in order to
> use a compound selector.
>
> It'd be fine with me if we removed the row or just changed the text s/simple/compound/. I don't feel strongly either way.

Selectors 3 :not() did not accept compound selectors, so the second suggestion
won't work.

How should we represent the fact that there was a :not() in Selectors 3 that
had a more limited syntax?

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 23:00:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:44 GMT