On 09/30/2011 09:59 AM, François REMY wrote: > This problem can also be solved by using a "var()" function for variables inside property values. > > Just a thought. Yes, I would prefer this. :) It means we can use vendor extensions for experimentation, and it means $ is available for more syntactic substitutions (either via CSS or via another layer, as is currently done). Although I don't mind changing Selectors as well, since I'm not particularly attached to using $. ~fantasaiReceived on Friday, 30 September 2011 18:28:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:50 UTC