W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

Re: [selectors4] :not accepts a compound selector

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:20:04 -0700
Message-ID: <4E860854.6080108@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 09/30/2011 01:15 AM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> In http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#overview, :not is described as:
> |E:not(s)|	an E element that does not match simple selector s	Negation pseudo-class
> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#negation> 	3
> |E:not(s1, s2)|	an E element that does not match either compound selector s1 or compound selector s2	Negation pseudo-class
> <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors4/#negation> 	4
>
> Notably, the comma-separated version takes compound selectors and the single-argument version takes a simple selector. I
> believe they should both take compound selectors.

They do: read the normative prose. Would you prefer if I removed the level 3 row
in the table?

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 30 September 2011 18:20:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:44 GMT