- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 16:01:16 -0700
- To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Ojan Vafai <ojan@google.com>
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: >> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] >> Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 3:11 PM >> >> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Alex Mogilevsky >> <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote: >> > 2009 spec was specific about effect of visibility:collapse >> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-flexbox-20090723/#displayorder >> > (removing the items completely, as in tables). All current >> > implementations do that, so the same text should probably appear in > the new spec. >> >> I'm not sure it's clear, actually. Is the collapsed item taken into >> account when dealing with "flex-pack:justify"? >> >> (I have no problem with adding similar text.) > > It seems that if "visibility:collapse" is targeting the same kind of dynamic scenarios as in tables, it should behave exactly as "display:none" in flexbox (no extra spacing in justify). It doesn't seem super useful then - but it does make it easier to show/hide items without wiping their 'display' property (your favorite inner/outer display issue). Seems fine to me. I'll make the change shortly. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 23 September 2011 23:02:12 UTC