W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

Re: Suggestion for @global to help with <style scoped>

From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:34:41 -0400
Message-ID: <CADC=+jduFC8e7aQjPGxb7zdS2RZHrdy7PwVbDmWbd3TnXKkn_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: www-style@w3.org, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Right, that's kind of where I was going... Removes the weirdness of being
able to use $ in a nonsensical manner and adds no additional pseudo class.
I'm not sure if that is what fantasai was saying, but wouldn't that work?
On Sep 21, 2011 1:17 PM, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, fantasai wrote:
>> On 09/20/2011 05:22 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> > On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, fantasai wrote:
>> > >
>> > > So, given that, rather than having a "scoped vs. global" switch, how
>> > > about using a pseudo-class to distinguish whether a portion of the
>> > > selector is matching out-of-scope elements? E.g.
>> > >
>> > > <style scoped>
>> > > section> h1 { border-bottom: solid; }
>> > > :context(body.homepage) h1 { color: red; }
>> > > :context(body.archive) h1 { color: gray; }
>> > > </style>
>> >
>> > ...what element does the :context() match against?
>>
>> The one defining the scope.
>
> So basically :context(...) is like :scope:matches(... #) ?
>
> --
> Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL
> http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 September 2011 17:35:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:44 GMT