W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] reasons for flex-order being <number> instead of <integer>?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:54:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCZRyfoo1kqETYNBsW5SA_7BEoLsPCXTDee_F+Om+NjWA@mail.gmail.com>
To: robert@ocallahan.org
Cc: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> For some reason I thought z-index accepted a <number>.
>>
>> It seems more convenient to have a <number>, because it's easier to
>> slot things between other things.  It's not a big deal, though, and
>> I'm fine with being consistent with z-index.
>
> I think it would make sense for flex-order to support <number> and to extend
> z-index to support <number> as well. I'm sure it would make authors' lives
> easier in some cases, and it would be easy to implement.

That also works for me.

~TJ
Received on Sunday, 30 October 2011 23:55:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:45 GMT