W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] reasons for flex-order being <number> instead of <integer>?

From: Tony Chang <tony@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:37:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL-=4P06sCBTrW1Wmn6ZoCWfvvO06ePz4LADNkRWdzO9j5HCHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> For some reason I thought z-index accepted a <number>.
>
> It seems more convenient to have a <number>, because it's easier to
> slot things between other things.  It's not a big deal, though, and
> I'm fine with being consistent with z-index.
>
> Anyone else have any particular opinions about this?
>

Integer sounds more consistent.  Maybe it was an int in an earlier spec
because that's how it's currently implemented in WebKit (it would be easy
to change to number if that's preferred).
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 23:38:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:45 GMT