W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Question

From: Fred . <eldmannen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:48:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJgfmqUUp3Cixx820d3Xj1yMHwceFcq9LoUveDDO0XNgsJtYRA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Thanks for your reply, yes I've posted to that mailing list.
I am aware of -moz-appearance and -webkit-appearence and tried it with
Firefox 6.0.2 and Chrome 14.

It seems only 'button' value is supported. :(


On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote:
> Hi Fred,
>
> Most of the CSS3 UI properties are actually fairly well implemented.
>
> The 'appearance' property in particular has shown to be problematic.
>
> While there are separate -webkit-appearance and -moz-webkit appearance
> properties, it's not clear how much they interoperate nor how similar
> they are to the currently defined 'appearance' property.
>
> Hence I've moved the 'appearance' property to be "at risk" in the
> editor's draft.
>
> If you don't mind, please to post additional feedback / comments /
> critique of CSS3-UI (and any CSS draft) on the www-style mailing list:
>
> www-style@w3.org
>
> so that we can publicly archive your comments and feedback and the follow-up.
>
> Feel free to CC me as well.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Tantek
>
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:21, Fred . <eldmannen@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Why is support for CSS Basic User Interface Module Level 3 so poorly
>> implemented?
>>
>> It seems no browser supports 'appearance', not even in the latest
>> versions except for 'button'.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://tantek.com/ - I made an HTML5 tutorial! http://tantek.com/html5
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 11:59:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:45 GMT