RE: [css3-values] More "random" issues from Brian Manthos on 2011-10-12 (www-style@w3.org from October 2011)

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 19:27:24 +0000
To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9710FCC2E88860489239BE0308AC5D17F06863@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.co>

Suppose a UA implemented "random" to always evaluate to 0, except on February 29th when it evaluates to 1.

Is that UA non-conformant?  Or does it just have a "somewhat undesirable" pseudorandom number generator?

Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 19:27:54 UTC