W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2011

vm/vmin vs. min() (was Re: [css3-values] Random Relatively-Trivial Issues)

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:30:00 -0700
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20111012163000.GA10623@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Wednesday 2011-10-12 00:03 -0700, fantasai wrote:
> Tab and I have a couple of proposals:
> 
> 1. Remove the 'vm' unit
>    - We have min() now, so we can use that.
>    - The abbreviation is non-obvious.
>    - If we keep it, rename to vmin so it's obvious.
> 
>    Filed as ISSUE-190 http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/190

Given the discussion about potentially dropping min() and max() in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/thread.html#msg233
I don't think we should drop things on the assumption that we can
use min() or max() instead.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Wednesday, 12 October 2011 16:30:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:45 GMT