On 10/1/11 8:47 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > I would agree that from an implementation standpoint, this is not optimal. It's not optimal from an authoring standpoint either: it significantly increases the cost of having a bunch of display:none subtrees in your DOM. > We should start with what behavior makes sense for authors, though. What do > you want display:none to do to an element's animation, or one running on a child > of that element ? Should it pause the animation ? Stop it ? Same question for > visibility:hidden. visibility:hidden shouldn't affect animations in any way, imho (e.g. if you're animating a width or height you can see the effect even if visibility:hidden). display:none is an interesting question. My main concern is whether animations should _start_ on display:none elements. Continuing them on such elements seems fine to me. Would authors expect an animation to start on a display:none element before it's shown? -BorisReceived on Sunday, 2 October 2011 01:19:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:50 UTC