W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2011

Re: [selectors4] minutes questions

From: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:36:35 -0500
Message-ID: <CADC=+jd4N+kmYyx96euwf3Oz-T2dUb+7YwXDdasGwdw8pAymAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Yes, that's what I meant.  I don't know if that is what was intended or
not.  I rather thought not since the phrase dynamic updates was used.  If
that were the case, what would not be a dynamic update?

-brian
On Nov 28, 2011 7:45 PM, "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 11/28/11 7:40 PM, Brian Kardell wrote:
>
>> Also .... David mentioned that the hard part of :has would be during
>> updates....it seems to me the inverse is true and that the initial pass
>> is considerably more difficult to optimize.  There are lots of tricks to
>> optimize the performance of updates for the vast majority of cases, but
>> on the initial draw its possible that you don't know that a rule matches
>> until much later.
>>
>
> I'm not sure why not.  Do you mean because the page is not done being
> parsed?  If so, that's just a special case of dynamic updates, no?
>
> -Boris
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 01:37:03 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:46 GMT