W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2011

Re: [css3-content] sizing of images inserted using the content property

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:35:25 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDQZ5qAO+1sQN3nut=35qUnr=ofGXO2mm4QNARKoZ5aEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Rivoal <florianr@opera.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 2011, at 8:15 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> Do you know who depends on this?  We should fix this bug, even if it's
>> just by jumping ahead and switching to the 'replaced <image>' grammar.
>
> You mean, '-webkit-replaced <image>'?

Yes, prefixes are just as annoying to have to write in emails as they
are in stylesheets.  ^_^

However, it would be bad to add a prefixed feature that's going to
rely on a currently obsolete spec.  We should either decide this
quickly, do it unprefixed, and then spec it when the opportunity
arises, or decide this quickly and put it in another appropriate spec
that *is* being maintained, like Image Values.  Since this is a very
simple feature and already has one implementation, I'd be fine with
smuggling it into Images 3 if we decided quickly enough.

~TJ
Received on Monday, 21 November 2011 17:36:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:46 GMT