W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2011

Re: [css3-images] Syntax of <position> in radial-gradient()

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:02:18 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCQz5Jv9mnN7YRaPUbh+JLJLN2y2L--tsvTzJ-S_0bBOg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: √ėyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> Has radial-gradient always had the full CSS3 background-position syntax? I was under the impression it used the more limited two-part syntax of CSS 2.1 background-position. I don't think I've seen any examples in the spec or on this list with a four-part position, such as 'radial-gradient(ellipse at right 20px bottom 30px to 20px 30px, red, yellow, green)'. Maybe it was the lack of such examples that lead me to that mistaken belief.

Yes, though there haven't ever been any examples, as you say.  THIS
MUST BE CORRECTED.

> Also, your examples in the ED need to be updated with the new 'at' 'to' syntax, and should not end with semicolons (since they are not property declarations in your examples).

Indeed.  I'm in the middle of a bunch of polish updates right now, and
I'll probably replace all the examples, since they're so ugly.

~TJ
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 17:03:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:46 GMT