W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2011

Re: [css3-images] Syntax of <position> in radial-gradient()

From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:54:32 +0100
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v4sg46nwbunlto@oyvinds-desktop>
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:36:27 +0100, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>  
> wrote:
>> The "radial-gradient() Syntax" section currently says that <position>  
>> "is
>> defined as the positioning syntax of 'background-position'".
>>
>> This is unclear. Why not say that it is equivalent to <bg-position> as
>> defined in css3-backgrounds?
>
> Because the ED of B&B now uses the more generic term <position>.

Ah, OK. Maybe "is defined *by* [something]" to make it clear this  
css3-images sentence is not the definition but rather refers to the  
definition.

> We'll push that to the CR draft at some point, since it's purely
> editorial.

Looks like a couple of instances of <bg-position> were left unchanged in  
the shorthand section.

-- 
Øyvind Stenhaug
Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Friday, 11 November 2011 15:55:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:46 GMT