W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2011

Re: [css3-animations] Possible spec bug?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 09:27:12 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCaNKzJvtsWnPFLJedu0D-E-JaOJtN1c+Yxtink1E7APg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
Cc: √ėyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then maybe that needs to change, as it breaks author expectations. If
> somebody put a non-animatable value in a keyframe, it's almost certain they
> didn't intend it to be ignored.
> Those values could be "animated" via a discrete step, either in the
> beginning, middle or end of the time between those two keyframes.
> History has proved that more relaxed syntax is always better than making
> things invalid or ignored.

Yes, we absolutely intend that all values should be transitionable,
with the ones that don't have explicit rules just going by a
single-step transition.  It just hasn't been done yet.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 16:28:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:46 GMT