W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [css3-color] Definition of 'opacity' makes no sense for block-inside-inline situations

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 06:07:55 +0900
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Cc: robert@ocallahan.org, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110531210755.GA31390@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Tuesday 2011-05-31 00:24 -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 5/30/11 11:52 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> >I think we should alter Appendix E step 6 so that it paints the block
> >children of the inline.
> I can live with that.
> I still think the behavior of 'opacity' should be clearly defined in
> terms of the Appendix E painting model.

I think Hixie's original draft of what became Appendix E did
describe how 'opacity' worked; that bit was removed for inclusion in
CSS 2.1.  I wish I could remember where that document lives.


L. David Baron                                 http://dbaron.org/
Mozilla Corporation                       http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 21:08:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:46 UTC