W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [css3-images] Composing generated images

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 14:52:26 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTinf-XzhNEXqV1oo2X4FUM3H9+ns3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> As such, I propose that we go ahead and disallow this kind of thing.
>> I'll define a <base-image> type that is produced by functions like url(),
>> image(), and linear-gradient().  Pipeline functions like
>> cross-fade() or filter() will be defined to only take <base-image>s as input,
>> and will produce <composed-image>s as output, so by definition you won't
>> be able to nest them.
> With and without your proposal, what's the expected behavior for transitions of background-image when the to and from both contain cross-fade?

Sigh, I had something like this tickling my brain, but I ignored it.
Yeah, transitioning a cross-fade() image produces a nested
cross-fade(), so there's no way to disallow it.  Never mind, then!

Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2011 21:53:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:46 UTC