- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 00:50:36 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, Chris Jones <cjon@microsoft.com>, Rossen Atanassov <Rossen.Atanassov@microsoft.com>
± From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] ± Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2011 3:50 PM ± ± http://www.xanthir.com/blog/b48H0 ± Ah, I remember that one. I suppose if you plan to develop it more it should be in CSS3 positioning too. ± > To me it seems reasonable to have separate specs, especially if css3- ± position will include all of CSS2.1 positioning, with writing modes, ± precise definition of the hypothetical static box etc. ± > ± > If we plan on that we can keep a concise positioning section in css3- ± floats until it is moved to your spec. ± ± Sounds good. It looks like the way to go for now... CSS3 Floats should be just floats, it will have a temporary positioning section and we will discuss the future of positioning spec separately.
Received on Thursday, 19 May 2011 00:51:05 UTC