- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 21:18:26 -0700
- To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Cc: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk <andrew.fedoniouk@live.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- From: Alex Mogilevsky >> So that is the reasoning that brought us to accepting replaced inline >> blocks as flexbox items. We initially suggested that any inline blocks >> should work, what we have is a compromise, but if we wean to revisit the >> decision I would again suggest that inline blocks are included for >> consistency... >> > > As <button>,<img>,<textarea>,etc. are display:inline-block > elements then how about these rules: > > 1. To treat all display:block, table, inline-block, list-item elements as > flex boxes. display:inline and text content will be wrapped into > boxes. They're display:inline, for legacy reasons that can't be changed now. If they were 'inline-block' we wouldn't be having this discussion, as the answer would obviously be exactly what you just said. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 14 May 2011 04:19:14 UTC