W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

RE: Gradients and background-repeat (Was: Re: Automatic spec annotations)

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 23:28:50 +0000
To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
CC: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FA122FEC823D524CB516E4E0374D9DCF1FAA76F9@TK5EX14MBXC138.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
> And of course, there is considerably less need for 'repeating-radial-gradient',
> other than for symmetry and consistency of properties if you do have a
> repeating-linear-gradient property.

Disagree.  IMO, there's *more* need for repeating-radial-gradient than there is for repeating-linear-gradient.

Some, arguably most, of what you can do with repeating-radial-gradient you can't do in any other way without using child elements to provide a larger surface to measure and draw against.

- Brian
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 23:29:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:45 UTC