W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [css3-speech] Editorial Comments Part II

From: Daniel Weck <daniel.weck@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 01:20:27 +0100
Message-Id: <E8CB5001-9581-41AA-B39F-7BAB565F688B@gmail.com>
To: W3C style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Fixed in the latest editors' draft, thanks!

http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-speech

On 2 May 2011, at 19:05, fantasai wrote:

> A couple quick, but significant comments:
>
> 1. For manageability (especially when testing), spec should be  
> broken down into
>   more subsections than it is currently. Except where pairs of  
> properties are
>   defined together (e.g. 'cue-before' + 'cue-after' share a  
> definition), each
>   property should get its own subsection.
>
> 2. It would be good for each feature that corresponds to an SSML  
> feature to
>   link to the appropriate section of the SSML spec, perhaps in a  
> note, so that
>   it's well understood how CSS3 Speech and SSML correspond. This  
> should also
>   help reviewers catch any mismatches. :)
>
> ~fantasai
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 00:27:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:40 GMT