W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [css3-images] Features Overview

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 18:22:42 -0700
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-Id: <8859F0F6-065E-4412-9834-BD44BF970539@gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>

On May 6, 2011, at 4:05 PM, fantasai wrote:

> To be fair, I'm not 100% clear on how this syntax is supposed to
> be handled in the general case. There are discussions there about
> clipping out the portion of the image, and others that are just
> about showing some kind of focus ring around that portion of the
> image. That alternate interpretation is the real issue with using
> this in url(), imho. 

Yeah, yuck! Maybe it is up to CSS to decide what to do with the identified fragment when used in CSS?

On May 6, 2011, at 3:48 PM, fantasai wrote:

> (On a related note, the Media Fragments WG needs to specify what happens
> when the fragment identifies coordinates that are not within the image
> bounds.)

I would hope for transparent pixels where the fragment exceeds the image bounds. Seems like that could be useful, even.
Received on Saturday, 7 May 2011 01:23:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:45 UTC